Separation of Anthocyanins in Echinacea Purpurea Flower by High Speed Counter current Chromatography and the Research on the Antioxidant Activity of the Anthocyanins
  
View Full Text    Download reader
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4957.年份.月份
KeyWord:high speed counter-current chromatography  Echinacea purpurea  anthocyanins  DPPH?  antioxidant activity
  
AuthorInstitution
李佳银,罗晋,李觅路,陆英,刘仲华 1.湖南农业大学国家植物功能成分利用工程技术研究中心; 2.湖南农业大学园艺园林学院
Hits: 2768
Download times: 1638
Abstract:
      An efficient method for the isolation and preparation of two anthocyanins,cyaniding 3-O-(β-D-giucopyranoside)(compound 1) and cyaniding 3-O-(6″-O-malonyl-β-D-glucopyranoside)(compound 2),from Echinacea purpurea flower by high speed counter-current chromatography(HSCCC) was established.The fresh flower was extracted with 60% ethanol(containing 0.1% HCl) at low temperature and dark conditions.2.1 g of crude sample for HSCCC was prepared after extracted with ethyl acetate and passed through an adsorbing column(2 cm× 30 cm,containing 100 mL D101 macroporous resin).Then water-n-butanol-methyl tert-butyl ether-acetonitrile-trifluoroacetic acid(6∶3∶2∶1∶0.001) was used as the two-phase solvent system,in which the upper phase was used as the stationary phase,while the lower phase was used as the mobile phase,the flow rate was set at 2.0 mL/min,and the revolution speed was 850 r/min.9.8 mg compound 1 with purity of 95.1% and 14.3 mg compound 2 with purity of 98.2% were obtained from 160 mg crude sample by one-step,as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC).The chemical structures were identified by mass spectrometry(MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging(NMR).Additionally,the antioxidant activities of the two compounds were also evaluated by the method of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl(DPPH?) radical scavenging assay with Vc as the control group.The results of antioxidative activity test showed that the two compounds have strong capacity of scavenging DPPH(EC50<10 mg/L).Both of their EC50 were lower than that of Vc,and the scavenging ability of compound 1 was stronger than that of compound 2.
Close